Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Williams v. State

Williams v. State

511 So. 2d 1044, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1918, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9754
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 462 So. 2d 36 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 5, 1987·No. No. 86-36·Published

Opinion

RYDER, Acting Chief Judge.

Appellant appeals the sentence imposed by the trial court arguing that the departure from the presumptive guidelines range is unsupported by any clear and convincing reasons. Based on the following cases, we agree. Scott v. State, 508 So.2d 335 (Fla.1987); State v. Tyner, 506 So.2d 405 (Fla.1987); Keys v. State, 500 So.2d 134 (Fla.1986); Whitehead v. State, 498 So.2d 863 (Fla.1986); State v. Mischler, 488 So.2d 523 (Fla.1986); Hendrix v. State, 475 So.2d 1218 (Fla.1985). We affirm appellant’s convictions and reverse and vacate appellant’s sentence and remand for resentencing within the guidelines.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded with instructions.

FRANK, J. and BOARDMAN, EDWARD F., (Ret.) J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 511 So. 2d 1044, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1918, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9754 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

511 So. 2d 1044 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scott v. State
508 So. 2d 335 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)
State v. Mischler
488 So. 2d 523 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
Keys v. State
500 So. 2d 134 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
Whitehead v. State
498 So. 2d 863 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
State v. Tyner
506 So. 2d 405 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)
Hendrix v. State
475 So. 2d 1218 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)