Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Williams v. State

Williams v. State

456 So. 2d 974, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2203, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15554
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 407 So. 2d 223 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 16, 1984·No. No. 83-1743·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We vacate the trial court’s retention of jurisdiction and remand with instructions that the court either enter an order stating with particularity the justification for retaining jurisdiction as required by section [975]*975947.16(3)(a), Florida Statutes (Supp.1982) or relinquish jurisdiction over the first half of the sentence. Mobley v. State, 409 So.2d 1031 (Fla.1982); Saname v. State, 448 So.2d 14 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Abbott v. State, 421 So.2d 24 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Hampton v. State, 419 So.2d 354 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).

Retention of jurisdiction vacated; remanded with instructions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 456 So. 2d 974, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2203, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15554 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

456 So. 2d 974 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Saname v. State
448 So. 2d 14 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Mobley v. State
409 So. 2d 1031 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1982)
Abbott v. State
421 So. 2d 24 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Hampton v. State
419 So. 2d 354 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)