Williams v. State

411 So. 2d 279, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19503
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 374 So. 2d 1086
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 17, 1982·No. No. 80-2209·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. We hold that the trial court did not err in refusing to instruct the jury on the penalties for lesser included offenses. Renaud v. State, 408 So.2d 1059 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). However, this cause is remanded to the trial court with instructions to strike the assessment of costs, Cox v. State, 334 So.2d 568 (Fla.1976).

ANSTEAD, BERANEK and GLICK-STEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 411 So. 2d 279, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19503 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

411 So. 2d 279 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cox v. State
334 So. 2d 568 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)
Renaud v. State
408 So. 2d 1059 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)