Williams v. State

406 So. 2d 1195, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21738
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 366 So. 2d 817
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 25, 1981·No. No. 79-1990·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a sentence and order of probation entered upon defendant’s plea of nolo contendere. Defendant reserved his right to appeal the trial court’s refusal to apply the sentencing procedures of Section 39.111, Florida Statutes (1979). The trial court’s refusal to sentence the defendant as a juvenile was based upon the fact that defendant was indicted, rather than being transferred from the Juvenile Division. See Postell v. State, 383 So.2d 1169 (Fla.3d DCA 1980). This constituted error under the recent case of State v. Goodson, 403 So.2d 1337 (Fla. 1981), wherein the Supreme Court held that a child charged by indictment should be considered “transferred for prosecution to the Criminal Division of the Circuit Court pursuant to Chapter 39.” The defendant’s sentence is therefore vacated and the matter remanded for further sentencing procedures in accordance with State v. Goodson, supra.

In view of the necessity for resentencing, all other issues are found to be moot.

REVERSED FOR RESENTENCING.

ANSTEAD, MOORE and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 406 So. 2d 1195, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21738 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

406 So. 2d 1195 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chotka v. Fidelco Growth Investors
383 So. 2d 1169 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
State v. Goodson
403 So. 2d 1337 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)