Williams v. State
507 So. 2d 745, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1308, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8262
Opinion
The State concedes that appellant is entitled to credit for time served against each of two sentences ordered to be served concurrently. We agree. See Daniels v. State, 491 So.2d 543 (Fla.1986). With such credit, appellant is entitled to immediate release.
The order denying appellant’s motion to mitigate and reduce his sentence is reversed, with directions to correct his sentence, and to immediately release him from imprisonment under that sentence.
Order REVERSED with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. State, 507 So. 2d 745, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1308, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8262 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).
507 So. 2d 745 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Martin v. State
525 So. 2d 901 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)