Williams v. State

468 So. 2d 1058, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1182, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14156
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 413 So. 2d 1263
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 13, 1985·No. No. BE-9·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the trial court’s denial of her rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief, in which she alleged she was improperly denied jail-time credit. We affirm the trial court’s order as it appears from the record that the credit sought by defendant [1059]*1059was for time spent in jail on charges for which she was acquitted or that were subsequently dropped and, further, that such charges were unrelated to the charges for which she was eventually convicted and sentenced. See Dixon v. State, 339 So.2d 688 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976).

AFFIRMED.

JOANOS, THOMPSON and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 468 So. 2d 1058, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1182, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14156 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

468 So. 2d 1058 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dixon v. State
339 So. 2d 688 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)