Williams v. State

422 So. 2d 1019, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21804
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 378 So. 2d 902
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 29, 1982·No. No. AH-377·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction of robbery with a firearm. In one of the five [1020]*1020points raised on appeal, the defendant alleges that the trial court erred in assessing a $10.00 fee pursuant to § 960.20, Fla. Stat. (Crimes Compensation Trust Fund) and in assessing a $2.00 fee pursuant to § 943.25(4), Fla.Stat. as part of his judgment and sentence because he is indigent. However, there is no record evidence that defendant presented an objection below to the assessment of these costs or that he raised this error by post-trial motion. Accordingly, this point is not preserved for purposes of appeal. We find no error in the remaining points raised by defendant and affirm his judgment and conviction.

MILLS, BOOTH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 422 So. 2d 1019, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21804 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

422 So. 2d 1019 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.