Williams v. State
378 So. 2d 853, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15994
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 353 So. 2d 588 →
Opinion
The sole point raised on appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to prove knowledge that the checks in question were forged. Since appellant failed to present that question to the trial court by appropriate motion, it has not been preserved for appellate review. State v. Barber, 301 So.2d 7 (Fla.1974); G. W. B. v. State, 340 So.2d 969 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976).
[854]*854Accordingly, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. State, 378 So. 2d 853, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15994 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).
378 So. 2d 853 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Barber
301 So. 2d 7 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1974)
G. W. B. v. State
340 So. 2d 969 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)