Williams v. State
350 So. 2d 842, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16707
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 21, 1977·No. No. FF-55·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Two eye-witnesses testified they saw a man attempt a burglary and later identified a man being held by the police as the burglar. A policeman testified appellant was the person identified by the eye-witnesses. [843]*843This identification evidence is sufficient to support a conviction. Johnson v. State, 249 So.2d 452 (Fla.4th DCA 1971) and Willis v. State, 208 So.2d 458 (Fla.1st DCA 1968), cert. quashed, 217 So.2d 106 (Fla.1968) are not to the contrary.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. State, 350 So. 2d 842, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16707 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).
350 So. 2d 842 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Freber
366 So. 2d 426 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1978)