Williams v. State

386 So. 2d 1313, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17493
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 353 So. 2d 588
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 26, 1980·No. No. 80-1581·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Williams appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion for post conviction relief brought under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. On direct appeal, we affirmed Williams’ conviction, Williams v. State, 354 So.2d 112 (Fla.3d DCA 1978).

His motion for post conviction relief is grounded on asserted errors at trial, all of which were available to be raised on direct appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s ruling. State v. Matera, 266 So.2d 661 (Fla.1972); Burau v. State, 353 So.2d 1183 (Fla.3d DCA 1978); Ashley v. State, 350 So.2d 839 (Fla.1st DCA 1977).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 386 So. 2d 1313, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17493 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

386 So. 2d 1313 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. State
354 So. 2d 112 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
State v. Matera
266 So. 2d 661 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1972)
Ashley v. State
350 So. 2d 839 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)