Williams v. State

421 So. 2d 26, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21436
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 19, 1982·No. No. AN-128·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MILLS, Judge.

Williams appeals the trial court’s summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

The first two issues raised by Williams were previously raised on direct appeal and cannot form the basis for collateral attack. Williams v. State, 386 So.2d 538 (Fla.1980). The third issue is without merit because newly discovered evidence may not be raised in a Rule 3.850 motion, but may only be raised by petition for writ of coram nobis [27]*27to the appellate court which originally affirmed the conviction. Hallman v. State, 371 So.2d 482 (Fla.1979).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 421 So. 2d 26, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21436 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

421 So. 2d 26 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gilliam v. State
493 So. 2d 56 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)