Williams v. State

432 So. 2d 813, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20512
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 395 So. 2d 1236
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 15, 1983·No. No. AR-325·Published

Opinion

MILLS, Judge.

Williams seeks review of the trial court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We affirm.

Three of the points raised by Williams are without merit because they have previously been raised on direct appeal. Williams v. State, 422 So.2d 847 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

In his remaining point, Williams argues that he was denied effective assistance of counsel. We find that these allegations fall short of the requirements for showing ineffective assistance of counsel as set forth in Knight v. State, 394 So.2d 997 (Fla.1981).

AFFIRMED.

SHIVERS and BOOTH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 432 So. 2d 813, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20512 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

432 So. 2d 813 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Knight v. State
394 So. 2d 997 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)