Williams v. State

392 So. 2d 617, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18673
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 358 So. 2d 187
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 21, 1981·No. No. 80-1351·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of two separate offenses, which were (1) possession and sale of heroin and (2) conspiracy to sell a controlled substance. On the first offense, appellant was sentenced to incarceration for a year and a day and then to be on probation for the remainder of the fifteen years. On the second offense appellant was given five years on probation. The court revoked appellant’s probation because of violation and imposed a single term of five years.

We affirm the revocation but vacate the sentence imposed because a general sentence is impermissible. Dorfman v. State, 351 So.2d 954 (Fla.1977); Worth v. State, 380 So.2d 553 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980). We also affirm his conviction for possession of heroin which was the cause of the revocation of his probation.

We vacate the sentence and remand for the trial court to impose an appropriate sentence.

SCHEB, C. J., and BOARDMAN and OTT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 392 So. 2d 617, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18673 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

392 So. 2d 617 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Worth v. State
380 So. 2d 553 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)