Williams v. State

427 So. 2d 331, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20254
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 1, 1983·No. No. 81-2044·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The final judgment of conviction and sentence under review is reversed and the cause is remanded for a new trial. First, we think the jury instruction on flight was improperly given in this case because there was insufficient evidence that the defendant fled the scene to avoid prosecution. Williams v. State, 378 So.2d 902 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Barnes v. State, 348 So.2d 599 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). Second, we think that the state was improperly allowed to cross-examine the defendant as to matters falling within the attorney-client privilege, which error we cannot say was harmless within the context of this case. Roberts v. Jardine, 366 So.2d 124 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 427 So. 2d 331, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20254 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

427 So. 2d 331 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fenelon v. State
594 So. 2d 292 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
Lefevre v. State
585 So. 2d 457 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)