Williams v. State
175 So. 566, 27 Ala. App. 529, 1937 Ala. App. LEXIS 104
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 26 Ala. App. 531 →
Opinion
The only question raised by this record is the sufficiency of the State’s evidence to sustain the judgment of guilt.
We have read the record, and giving to the judgment of the court that presumption, to which it is entitled, we hold that the record is free from error, and the judgment is sustained by the evidence.
Let the judgment be affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. State, 175 So. 566, 27 Ala. App. 529, 1937 Ala. App. LEXIS 104 (Ala. Ct. App. 1937).
175 So. 566 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.