Williams v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Williams v. State

169 So. 337, 27 Ala. App. 227, 1936 Ala. App. LEXIS 128

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 19, 1936

Docket6 Div. 961.

StatusPublished

This text of 169 So. 337 (Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. State, 169 So. 337, 27 Ala. App. 227, 1936 Ala. App. LEXIS 128 (Ala. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, Judge,

The indictment was in two counts, 0ne charging the manufacture of whisky, an¿ the other the unlawful possession of a still, etc. The verdict was general and referable to either count in the indictment. Haney v. State, 19 Ala.App. 79, 95 So. 57.

The evidence for the state was sufficient to justjfy a verdict of guilt, and, while the testimony of the defendants was to the contrary, the question was for the jury,

other exceptions baye been examined, and we find them all free from error/

. , , . rr , The judgment is affirmed. °

A rmed*

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI