Williams v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Williams v. State

152 So. 927, 26 Ala. App. 702

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 9, 1934

Docket5 Div. 915.

StatusPublished

This text of 152 So. 927 (Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. State, 152 So. 927, 26 Ala. App. 702 (Ala. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, Judge.

This cause was tried by the court sitting without a jury, and, while there are some technical errors appearing in the record, the rulings did not probably injuriously affect the defendant’s rights, and none of these errors is of such nature as would justify a reversal.

Giving to the findings of the court the presumption to which they are entitled, we cannot say that the judgment is error, and, finding no reversible error, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, Judge.

This cause was tried by the court sitting without a jury, and, while there are some technical errors appearing in the record, the rulings did not probably injuriously affect the defendant’s rights, and none of these errors is of such nature as would justify a reversal.

Giving to the findings of the court the presumption to which they are entitled, we cannot say that the judgment is error, and, finding no reversible error, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

152 So. 927, 26 Ala. App. 702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-state-alactapp-1934.