Williams v. State
145 So. 927, 25 Ala. App. 697
Opinion
It is evident that the appeal in this case was for delay. The appellant when arraigned in the lower court interposed a plea of guilty to the offense of violating the prohibition law upon which he was adjudged guilty, but, notwithstanding this, he appealed from the judgment of conviction. He had this right, however. Wright’s Case, 209 Ala. 374, 96 So. 316.
The record upon which this appeal is rested is regular and without error, and the cause is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. State, 145 So. 927, 25 Ala. App. 697 (Ala. Ct. App. 1933).
145 So. 927 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Peever v. City Com'rs of Florence
155 So. 887 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1934)