Williams v. State

125 So. 928, 23 Ala. App. 688

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 22 Ala. App. 489 →

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided January 21, 1930·No. 3 Div. 656.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

Prom a judgment of conviction for distilling, etc., prohibited liquors, and for the possession of a still, etc., to be used for that purpose, this appeal was taken. ' .

The judgment of conviction referred to will stand affirmed, as pronounced and entered, as there is no error of a reversible nature apparent upon the record, and upon the record this appeal is based.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

Prom a judgment of conviction for distilling, etc., prohibited liquors, and for the possession of a still, etc., to be used for that purpose, this appeal was taken. ' .

The judgment of conviction referred to will stand affirmed, as pronounced and entered, as there is no error of a reversible nature apparent upon the record, and upon the record this appeal is based.

Affirmed.

Williams v. State, 125 So. 928, 23 Ala. App. 688 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

125 So. 928 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.