Williams v. State

709 So. 2d 499, 1996 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 276, 1996 WL 637399
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 641 So. 2d 1305
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided November 1, 1996·No. CR-95-1853·Published

Opinion

COBB, Judge.

The appellant, Darrel Williams, appeals from the trial court’s denial of his Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P., petition challenging his conviction for robbery in the first degree. After a hearing, the trial court summarily denied the petition without making written findings of fact. The State concedes that this case must be remanded in order for the trial court to “make specific findings of fact relating to each material issue of fact presented.” See Rule 32.9(d), Ala.R.Crim.P.

This case is remanded to the circuit court so that it may comply with Rule 32.9(d), Ala.R.Crim.P. Due return should be filed with this court no later than 63 days from the date of this opinion.

[500]*500REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 709 So. 2d 499, 1996 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 276, 1996 WL 637399 (Ala. Ct. App. 1996).

709 So. 2d 499 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.