Home/Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama/Williams v. State

Williams v. State

648 So. 2d 620, 1994 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 384, 1994 WL 484590
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 601 So. 2d 1062 →
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided September 9, 1994·No. CR 93-67·Published

Opinion

ON RETURN TO REMAND

BOWEN, Presiding Judge.

On remand, the circuit court conducted an evidentiary hearing at which the appellant’s allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel were addressed. The circuit court entered written findings of fact and denied the petition for post-conviction relief. That court found that the appellant’s allegations were without merit; those findings are supported by the record of the evidentiary hearing. Therefore, the judgment of the circuit court denying the petition is affirmed.

OPINION EXTENDED; AFFIRMED.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 648 So. 2d 620, 1994 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 384, 1994 WL 484590 (Ala. Ct. App. 1994).

648 So. 2d 620 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.