Williams v. State

640 So. 2d 43, 1994 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 90, 1994 WL 63519
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 601 So. 2d 1062
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided March 4, 1994·No. CR-92-0696·Published

Opinion

On Return to Remand

PATTERSON, Judge.

On October 22, 1993, we remanded tMs cause to the trial court with instructions that that court order the state to file responsive pleadings and to hold an evidentiary hearing on the merits of John C. Williams’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. 640 So.2d 42. The trial court has filed an order dated October 30, 1993, which we will consider as a return to our remand. The order shows that on motion of the state, the disciplinary proceedings of September 8,1992, which are the subject of the instant habeas corpus petition and as a result of which Williams was found guilty of violating prison regulations and certain punishment was imposed, were declared void by the trial court, with leave to the state to reinstate the proceedings at a later time. [44]*44The action of the trial court renders this appeal moot. It is due to be dismissed.

DISMISSED.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 640 So. 2d 43, 1994 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 90, 1994 WL 63519 (Ala. Ct. App. 1994).

640 So. 2d 43 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. State
640 So. 2d 42 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1993)