Williams v. Florida Parole Commission

801 So. 2d 292, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17474, 2001 WL 1580307
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 12, 2001·No. No. 1D00-0120·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order of dismissal for failure to comply with the court’s case management order is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings. See Tooma v. Moore, 743 So.2d 1189, 1189 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)(“As this court has previously and succinctly held, it is an abuse of discretion to dismiss a petition for failing to comply with the requirements of section 57.085 without first affording to the party an opportunity to correct the deficiencies.”); see also Bandy v. Sheffield, 751 So.2d 164, 164 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Masiello v. Moore, 739 So.2d 1196, 1196 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Marquart v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 701 So.2d 674, 675 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).

ALLEN, C.J., BOOTH and BENTON, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Florida Parole Commission, 801 So. 2d 292, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17474, 2001 WL 1580307 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

801 So. 2d 292 (Williams v. Florida Parole Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hlot Family Ltd. Partnership v. Magnolia Plantation Property Owners'ass'n. Inc.
801 So. 2d 292 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)