Tooma v. Moore

743 So. 2d 1189, 1999 WL 982943
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 1, 1999
Docket98-2135
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 743 So. 2d 1189 (Tooma v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tooma v. Moore, 743 So. 2d 1189, 1999 WL 982943 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

743 So.2d 1189 (1999)

Joseph TOOMA, Appellant,
v.
Michael W. MOORE, et al., Appellees.

No. 98-2135.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

November 1, 1999.

Pro se, for Appellant.

Joy A. Stubbs, Assistant General Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellees.

BROWNING, J.

Appellant appeals the trial court's order dismissing his petition for writ of mandamus for failure to comply with the terms of the trial court's case management order. Along with his petition for writ of mandamus, Appellant submitted documentation to proceed with his suit as an indigent pursuant to section 57.085, Florida Statutes (1997). However, Appellant's documentation failed to include the prisoner trust account statement required both by statute and the case management order. Appellant argues the trial court abused its discretion by dismissing his petition without first affording him an opportunity to correct the deficiency. We agree.

As this court has previously and succinctly held, it is an abuse of discretion to dismiss a petition for failing to comply with the requirements of section 57.085 without first affording to the party an opportunity to correct the deficiencies. Marquart v. Florida Parole Comm'n, 701 So.2d 674 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Masiello v. Moore, 739 So.2d 1196 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

Accordingly, the trial court's order of dismissal is REVERSED and the matter REMANDED to allow Appellant an opportunity to correct the deficiencies in his original submission.

BOOTH and KAHN, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reese v. McDonough
947 So. 2d 1286 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Williams v. Florida Parole Commission
801 So. 2d 292 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
743 So. 2d 1189, 1999 WL 982943, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tooma-v-moore-fladistctapp-1999.