Reese v. McDonough

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Reese v. McDonough

947 So. 2d 1286, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 1515, 2007 WL 412499

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 8, 2007

DocketNo. 1D05-3053

StatusPublished

This text of 947 So. 2d 1286 (Reese v. McDonough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reese v. McDonough, 947 So. 2d 1286, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 1515, 2007 WL 412499 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James Reese appeals an order dismissing his petition for writ of mandamus for failure to comply with the circuit court’s case management order directing him to file appropriate indigency documentation, as required by section 57.085(2), Florida Statutes (2003). In particular, Reese failed to file a copy of his inmate bank account statement for the six months preceding the filing of his petition. Given the reasonable position taken by the Department of Corrections before this court, we REVERSE the circuit court’s order of dismissal and REMAND the case to allow Reese one opportunity to correct the deficiencies in his indigency submissions. See, e.g., Tooma v. Moore, 743 So.2d 1189 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Masiello v. Moore, 739 So.2d 1196 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Marquarb v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 701 So.2d 674 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).

ALLEN, KAHN, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

James Reese appeals an order dismissing his petition for writ of mandamus for failure to comply with the circuit court’s case management order directing him to file appropriate indigency documentation, as required by section 57.085(2), Florida Statutes (2003). In particular, Reese failed to file a copy of his inmate bank account statement for the six months preceding the filing of his petition. Given the reasonable position taken by the Department of Corrections before this court, we REVERSE the circuit court’s order of dismissal and REMAND the case to allow Reese one opportunity to correct the deficiencies in his indigency submissions. See, e.g., Tooma v. Moore, 743 So.2d 1189 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Masiello v. Moore, 739 So.2d 1196 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Marquarb v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 701 So.2d 674 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).

ALLEN, KAHN, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

947 So. 2d 1286, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 1515, 2007 WL 412499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reese-v-mcdonough-fladistctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack