Bandy v. Sheffield

751 So. 2d 164, 2000 WL 125929
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 4, 2000
Docket1D98-3803
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 751 So. 2d 164 (Bandy v. Sheffield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bandy v. Sheffield, 751 So. 2d 164, 2000 WL 125929 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

751 So.2d 164 (2000)

Fabian BANDY, Appellant,
v.
Frank SHEFFIELD, Appellee.

No. 1D98-3803.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 4, 2000.

Fabian Bandy, Pro Se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Daniel A. David, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The lower court should not have dismissed the appellant's mandamus petition without clarifying what additional filings were needed to comport with the case management order, and without then giving the appellant a reasonable amount of time within which to comply. See Gonzalez v. Moore, 743 So.2d 158 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). The appealed order is therefore reversed and the case is remanded.

ALLEN, WEBSTER and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. Florida Parole Commission
801 So. 2d 292 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Vanderberg v. Moore
765 So. 2d 94 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
751 So. 2d 164, 2000 WL 125929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bandy-v-sheffield-fladistctapp-2000.