Vanderberg v. Moore
765 So. 2d 94, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5712, 2000 WL 574371
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 15, 2000·No. No. 1D99-903·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The trial court should not have dismissed appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus without specifying which documents appellant failed to supply in his previous filings under section 57.085(7), Florida Statutes (1997). See Bandy v. Sheffield, 751 So.2d 164 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Gosman v. Moore, 745 So.2d 416 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).
REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vanderberg v. Moore, 765 So. 2d 94, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5712, 2000 WL 574371 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
765 So. 2d 94 (Vanderberg v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rowe v. State
765 So. 2d 94 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)