William Smith v. United States
This text of 267 F.2d 691 (William Smith v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
This is an appeal from conviction for assault with a dangerous weapon, a razor, in the course of a fight with the complaining witness. The grounds for appeal are (1) that the jury was not specifically charged that intent to commit injury with the razor was an essential element of the crime1 (no request for such specific charge was made); and (2) that the government’s argument to the jury was prejudicially improper. We have examined the record and conclude the appeal should be dismissed as improvidently granted. Court appointed counsel ably presented appellant’s contentions.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
267 F.2d 691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-smith-v-united-states-cadc-1959.