Willheim v. Murchison
This text of 312 F.2d 399 (Willheim v. Murchison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Else WILLHEIM and Randolph Phillips, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
John D. MURCHISON and Clint W. Murchison, Jr., co-partners
d/b/a Murchison Brothers; Investors Diversified
Services, Inc.; and Investors Mutual,
Inc., Defendants-Appellants.
No. 191, Docket 27806.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued Jan. 10, 1963.
Decided Jan. 18, 1963.
Samuel E. Gates, of Debevoise, Plimpton, Lyons & Gates, New York City (J. Edward Fowler, Robert L. King, and J. Asa Routree, of Debevoise, Plimpton, Lyons & Gates, New York City, on the brief for appellant Investors Diversified Services, Inc.; Taggart Whipple, Philip C. Potter, Jr., and Roland W. Donnem, of Davis, Polk, Wardwell, Sunderland & Kiendl, New York City, on the brief for appellant Investors Mutual, Inc.; and Stuart N. Updike and Lee W. Meyer, of Townley, Updike, Carter & Rodgers, New York City, on the brief for appellants John D. Murchison and Clint W. Murchison, Jr.), for defendants-appellants.
Randolph Phillips, pro se, and Leonard I. Schreiber, New York City, for plaintiffs-appellees.
Before CLARK, KAUFMAN, and HAYS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
We hold that the case is governed by Fleischer v. Phillips, 2 Cir., 264 F.2d 515, cert. denied 359 U.S. 1002, 79 S.Ct. 1139, 3 L.Ed.2d 1030, and Marco v. Dulles, 2 Cir., 268 F.2d 192, and accordingly dismiss the appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
312 F.2d 399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willheim-v-murchison-ca2-1963.