William Marco, as Administrator, Etc. v. John Foster Dulles, and Ridge Realization Corporation
This text of 268 F.2d 192 (William Marco, as Administrator, Etc. v. John Foster Dulles, and Ridge Realization Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Judge Bryan’s opinion denying the motion is reported in 169 F.Supp. 622. In taking its appeal appellant relied upon Harmar Drive-In Theatre, Inc. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, 2 Cir., 239 F.2d 555, rehearing denied 241 F.2d 937, certiorari denied 355 U.S. 824, 78 S.Ct. 31, 2 L.Ed.2d 38, as establishing that the order was appealable. Subsequent to taking its appeal the case of Fleischer v. Phillips, 2 [193]*193Cir., 264 F.2d 515, certiorari denied Fleischer v. Benjamin, 359 U.S. 1002, 79 S.Ct. 1139, was decided by this court. That case demonstrates that an order denying a motion to disqualify attorneys is interlocutory and not appealable without compliance with 28 U.S.C.A. § 1292(b). Accordingly we are constrained to dismiss the appeal. So ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
268 F.2d 192, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-marco-as-administrator-etc-v-john-foster-dulles-and-ridge-ca2-1959.