Wilkins v. Gaddy
This text of 308 F. App'x 696 (Wilkins v. Gaddy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jamey Lamont Wilkins appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wilkins v. Officer Gaddy, No. 3:08-cv-00138-GCM, 2008 WL 1782372 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 17, 2008); 2008 WL 4005668 (Aug. 25, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
308 F. App'x 696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilkins-v-gaddy-ca4-2009.