Wilkins v. Gaddy

Fourth Circuit

Wilkins v. Gaddy

308 F. App'x 696

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 23, 2009·No. No. 08-7881·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jamey Lamont Wilkins appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wilkins v. Officer Gaddy, No. 3:08-cv-00138-GCM, 2008 WL 1782372 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 17, 2008); 2008 WL 4005668 (Aug. 25, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Jamey Lamont Wilkins appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wilkins v. Officer Gaddy, No. 3:08-cv-00138-GCM, 2008 WL 1782372 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 17, 2008); 2008 WL 4005668 (Aug. 25, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Wilkins v. Gaddy, 308 F. App'x 696 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

308 F. App'x 696 (Wilkins v. Gaddy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related