Wilkins v. Gaddy
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7187
JAMEY LAMONT WILKINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICER GADDY, in his individual and official capacity,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:08-cv-00299-GCM)
Submitted: October 21, 2008 Decided: October 29, 2008
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jamey Lamont Wilkins, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Jamey Lamont Wilkins appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Wilkins v. Officer Gaddy, No. 3:08-cv-00299-GCM
(W.D.N.C. July 2, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wilkins v. Gaddy (Wilkins v. Gaddy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.