Wilkins v. Gaddy

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wilkins v. Gaddy. Read the opinion of the Court — 308 F. App'x 696
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 29, 2008·No. 08-7187·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7187

JAMEY LAMONT WILKINS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

OFFICER GADDY, in his individual and official capacity,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:08-cv-00299-GCM)

Submitted: October 21, 2008 Decided: October 29, 2008

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jamey Lamont Wilkins, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jamey Lamont Wilkins appeals the district court’s

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Wilkins v. Officer Gaddy, No. 3:08-cv-00299-GCM

(W.D.N.C. July 2, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilkins v. Gaddy, (4th Cir. 2008).

Wilkins v. Gaddy (Wilkins v. Gaddy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related