Wilkins v. Gaddy

Fourth Circuit

Wilkins v. Gaddy

298 F. App'x 284

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wilkins v. Gaddy. Read the opinion of the Court — 308 F. App'x 696 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 29, 2008·No. No. 08-7187·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jamey Lamont Wilkins appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wilkins v. Officer Gaddy, No. 3:08-cv-00299-GCM, 2008 WL 2645677 (W.D.N.C. July 2, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Jamey Lamont Wilkins appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wilkins v. Officer Gaddy, No. 3:08-cv-00299-GCM, 2008 WL 2645677 (W.D.N.C. July 2, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Wilkins v. Gaddy, 298 F. App'x 284 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

298 F. App'x 284 (Wilkins v. Gaddy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related