Wilkie v. Hartford

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wilkie v. Hartford. Read the opinion of the Court — 2021 MT 221
Montana Supreme Court·Decided March 9, 2021·No. DA 20-0514·Unpublished

Opinion

03/09/2021

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Case Number: DA 20-0514

Supreme Court No. DA 20-0514 _______________________________________________________

PAUL WILKIE,

Plaintiff/Appellant,

v.

HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY, a/k/a/ THE HARTFORD; RICHARD L. SPROUT; and SHAUNA SPROUT,

Defendants/Appellees. _______________________________________________________

On Appeal from the Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Gallatin County, Cause No. DV-20-367B, Hon. Rienne H. McElyea _______________________________________________________

Grant of Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time _______________________________________________________

Pursuant to authority granted under Rule 26, M.R.App.P., Appellant’s

Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time is granted. The deadline for Wilkie to reply to

the Sprouts’ opening brief is extended until the date on or before which Wilkie must

reply to Hartford’s opening brief, including any extension.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court March 9 2021

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilkie v. Hartford, (Mo. 2021).

Wilkie v. Hartford (Wilkie v. Hartford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.