Wilkie v. Hartford
This text of Wilkie v. Hartford (Wilkie v. Hartford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
01/15/2021
Case Number: DA 20-0514
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
No. DA 20-0514
PAUL WILKE, Petitioner and Appellant, ORDER GRANTING vs. MOTION OF MONTANA TRIAL LAWYERS HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS ASSOCIATION FOR LEAVE INSURANCE COMPANY, a/k/a THE TO APPEAR AS AMICUS HARTFORD; RICHARD L. SPROUT; CURIAE and SHAUNA SPROUT Respondent and Appellee.
Upon motion of the Montana Trial Lawyers Association (“MTLA”) for
leave to participate as an amicus curiae in the above-caption matter, and good
cause appearing therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that MTLA’S Motion is GRANTED. MTLA
shall file is amicus brief on or before the same date when the Appelant’s brief is
due.
Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath 1 Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court January 15 2021
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wilkie v. Hartford, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilkie-v-hartford-mont-2021.