Wilkie v. Hartford

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wilkie v. Hartford. Read the opinion of the Court — 2021 MT 221
Montana Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 2021·No. DA 20-0514·Unpublished

Opinion

01/15/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0514

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0514

PAUL WILKE, Petitioner and Appellant, ORDER GRANTING vs. MOTION OF MONTANA TRIAL LAWYERS HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS ASSOCIATION FOR LEAVE INSURANCE COMPANY, a/k/a THE TO APPEAR AS AMICUS HARTFORD; RICHARD L. SPROUT; CURIAE and SHAUNA SPROUT Respondent and Appellee.

Upon motion of the Montana Trial Lawyers Association (“MTLA”) for

leave to participate as an amicus curiae in the above-caption matter, and good

cause appearing therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that MTLA’S Motion is GRANTED. MTLA

shall file is amicus brief on or before the same date when the Appelant’s brief is

due.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath 1 Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court January 15 2021

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilkie v. Hartford, (Mo. 2021).

Wilkie v. Hartford (Wilkie v. Hartford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.