Wilkerson v. State

82 So. 3d 1201, 2012 WL 921357, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4330

• Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
• Decided: March 20, 2012
• Docket: 1D11-3628
• Status: Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s finding that Appellant violated certain terms of his probation and the judgment and sentence imposed thereafter. The cause is remanded with directions to enter a corrected order revoking probation to conform with the trial court’s oral pronouncements. See Robinson v. State, 968 So.2d 339 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (affirming appellant’s probation revocation, but remanding with directions to enter a corrected order conforming to the trial court’s oral pronouncements).

At the conclusion of the probation revocation hearing, the trial court orally pronounced its findings that Appellant willfully violated Conditions (1), (3), (5), (15), and (20) of his probation. The court’s written order, however, indicates the court found Appellant also violated Conditions (2), (10), and (12), for which the court made no findings. Accordingly, the revocation of Appellant’s probation is affirmed, but the cause is remanded with directions to enter a corrected order conforming to the trial court’s oral pronouncements.

AFFIRMED, but REMANDED with directions consistent with this opinion.

DAVIS, THOMAS, and RAY, JJ., concur.