Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Merriex v. State

Merriex v. State

210 So. 3d 757, 2017 WL 573657, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1828
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 14, 2017
DocketCASE NO. 1D16-2217
StatusPublished

This text of 210 So. 3d 757 (Merriex v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Merriex v. State, 210 So. 3d 757, 2017 WL 573657, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1828 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders appeal, we affirm the trial court’s order revoking probation and the resulting sentence. We remand, however, for correction of a scrivener’s error in the written order of revocation. The trial court’s order incorrectly referenced “conditions 7 & 6” rather than conditions five and six as alleged in the affidavit of violation and as orally pronounced at the hearing. On remand, the court should enter a corrected order that conforms to its oral [758]*758pronouncement. See Wilkerson v. State, 82 So.3d 1201 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED for correction.

OSTERHAUS, JAY, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilkerson v. State
82 So. 3d 1201 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
210 So. 3d 757, 2017 WL 573657, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merriex-v-state-fladistctapp-2017.