Michael Allen Clark v. State of Florida
This text of Michael Allen Clark v. State of Florida (Michael Allen Clark v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D18-2472 _____________________________
MICHAEL ALLEN CLARK,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County. Brantley S. Clark, Judge.
July 10, 2019
PER CURIAM.
In this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we affirm the revocation of Appellant’s probation and the resulting judgment and sentence. We note, however, that the written revocation order does not conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement in that it indicates Appellant violated conditions three and five of his probation, when the court found only a violation of condition three. On remand, the court should enter a corrected order accurately specifying the basis for the revocation. See Wilkerson v. State, 82 So. 3d 1201 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).
AFFIRMED and REMANDED with directions.
RAY, C.J., and WETHERELL and WINOKUR, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Michael Allen Clark v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-allen-clark-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2019.