Michael Allen Clark v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 10, 2019·No. 18-2472·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

No. 1D18-2472

MICHAEL ALLEN CLARK,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County. Brantley S. Clark, Judge.

July 10, 2019

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we affirm the revocation of Appellant’s probation and the resulting judgment and sentence. We note, however, that the written revocation order does not conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement in that it indicates Appellant violated conditions three and five of his probation, when the court found only a violation of condition three. On remand, the court should enter a corrected order accurately specifying the basis for the revocation. See Wilkerson v. State, 82 So. 3d 1201 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED with directions.

RAY, C.J., and WETHERELL and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Michael Allen Clark v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Michael Allen Clark v. State of Florida (Michael Allen Clark v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Wilkerson v. State
82 So. 3d 1201 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)