Wilford v. Salvucci

Supreme Court of Vermont

Wilford v. Salvucci

95 A.2d 41, 117 Vt. 501, 1953 Vt. LEXIS 122

DecidedFebruary 3, 1953

StatusPublished

This text of 95 A.2d 41 (Wilford v. Salvucci) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilford v. Salvucci, 95 A.2d 41, 117 Vt. 501, 1953 Vt. LEXIS 122 (Vt. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Cleary, J.

The plaintiff in this case is the husband of the plaintiff in the case of Ruth Wilford v. Peter Salvucci. That case was decided at the present term of this Court, ante, page 495. In this case the plaintiff was awarded a verdict by the jury for doctors’ and hospital bills incurred by him because of the injuries caused his wife by the alleged negligence of the defendant and judgment was entered on the verdict. The two cases were tried below and heard here together. The present case is here on the defendant’s exceptions to the denial of his motions for a directed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The reasons assigned are the same as in the companion case.

The. plaintiff now has filed a motion to reverse the judgment, set aside the verdict and for a new trial on all issues. The defendant does not object to the motion. For the reasons stated in the opinion in the companion case the entry in the present case is judgment reversed pro forma, verdict set aside and cause remanded for a new trial on all issues.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cleary, J.

The plaintiff in this case is the husband of the plaintiff in the case of Ruth Wilford v. Peter Salvucci. That case was decided at the present term of this Court, ante, page 495. In this case the plaintiff was awarded a verdict by the jury for doctors’ and hospital bills incurred by him because of the injuries caused his wife by the alleged negligence of the defendant and judgment was entered on the verdict. The two cases were tried below and heard here together. The present case is here on the defendant’s exceptions to the denial of his motions for a directed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The reasons assigned are the same as in the companion case.

The. plaintiff now has filed a motion to reverse the judgment, set aside the verdict and for a new trial on all issues. The defendant does not object to the motion. For the reasons stated in the opinion in the companion case the entry in the present case is judgment reversed pro forma, verdict set aside and cause remanded for a new trial on all issues.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 A.2d 41, 117 Vt. 501, 1953 Vt. LEXIS 122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilford-v-salvucci-vt-1953.