Hill v. Stringer

Supreme Court of Vermont

Hill v. Stringer

75 A.2d 660, 116 Vt. 301, 1950 Vt. LEXIS 151

DecidedOctober 3, 1950

StatusPublished

This text of 75 A.2d 660 (Hill v. Stringer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hill v. Stringer, 75 A.2d 660, 116 Vt. 301, 1950 Vt. LEXIS 151 (Vt. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Sherburne, C. J.

The plaintiff in this action is the husband of the plaintiff in Hill v. Stringer, ante, p. 296, 75 A2d 657, and seeks to recover from the same defendant for loss of services and expenditures claimed to have been caused by the latter’s negligent operation of an automobile. The two cases were tried below and heard here together, and present the same question here. The decision in that case is conclusive here.

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sherburne, C. J.

The plaintiff in this action is the husband of the plaintiff in Hill v. Stringer, ante, p. 296, 75 A2d 657, and seeks to recover from the same defendant for loss of services and expenditures claimed to have been caused by the latter’s negligent operation of an automobile. The two cases were tried below and heard here together, and present the same question here. The decision in that case is conclusive here.

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

75 A.2d 660, 116 Vt. 301, 1950 Vt. LEXIS 151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hill-v-stringer-vt-1950.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack