Wilczinski v. Smith

70 So. 347, 110 Miss. 251
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1915
StatusPublished

This text of 70 So. 347 (Wilczinski v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilczinski v. Smith, 70 So. 347, 110 Miss. 251 (Mich. 1915).

Opinion

Cook, J.,

delivered the opinion, of the court.

Appellee, as a junior mortgagee, was entitled to have the payments made by J. E. King applied to the principal of the indebtedness. McAlister v. Jerman, 32 Miss. 142; Chaffe v. Wilson, 59 Miss. 42; Boyd v. Warmack, 62 Miss. 536.

By eliminating the usurious interest and by crediting J. E. King with the market value of the property delivered to appellant, we are unable to say that the chancery court erred in entering a decree in favor of C. R. Smith. There was a conflict of evidence as to the amount of credit King was entitled to, but this conflict was solved against appellant. •

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chaffe v. Wilson
59 Miss. 42 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1881)
Boyd v. Warmack
62 Miss. 536 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1885)
M'Alister v. Jerman
32 Miss. 142 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1856)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 So. 347, 110 Miss. 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilczinski-v-smith-miss-1915.