Wilczinski v. Smith
This text of 70 So. 347 (Wilczinski v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion, of the court.
Appellee, as a junior mortgagee, was entitled to have the payments made by J. E. King applied to the principal of the indebtedness. McAlister v. Jerman, 32 Miss. 142; Chaffe v. Wilson, 59 Miss. 42; Boyd v. Warmack, 62 Miss. 536.
By eliminating the usurious interest and by crediting J. E. King with the market value of the property delivered to appellant, we are unable to say that the chancery court erred in entering a decree in favor of C. R. Smith. There was a conflict of evidence as to the amount of credit King was entitled to, but this conflict was solved against appellant. •
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
70 So. 347, 110 Miss. 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilczinski-v-smith-miss-1915.