M'Alister v. Jerman

32 Miss. 142
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1856
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 32 Miss. 142 (M'Alister v. Jerman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
M'Alister v. Jerman, 32 Miss. 142 (Mich. 1856).

Opinion

Fisher, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The complainant filed this bill on the chancery side of the Circuit Court of Tippah county, for the purpose of enjoining the defendants below from selling a certain tract of land which the complainant had purchased from one Johnson, and upon which Johnson had executed a deed of trust to secure the defendants in the payment of the sum of $ 101, being a loan of money to Johnson.

The facts are these: the debt being due, the parties entered into an agreement by which Johnson was to pay for forbearance, a rate of interest exceeding eight per cent, per annum. Such a contract has been decided by this court to be in violation of the statute on the subject. Newman v. Williams, 29 Miss. R. When Jerman purchased the landfro.m Johnson, it was agreed that he should pay the balance due on this debt. This must of course be understood to mean merely the balance legally due; and Jerman, aside from [144]*144any agreement on the subject, could make any defence •which Johnson could make against the sale of the land.

The court decreed that the debtors should collect only the balance of the principal due, and applied the sums paid by way of illegal interest, as credits on the note. This decree conforms to the principles settled in the case of Newman v. Williams, above cited.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sunburst Bank v. Keith
648 So. 2d 1147 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1995)
Associates Discount Corp. v. Ruddock
81 So. 2d 249 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1955)
Hardin v. Grenada Bank
180 So. 805 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1938)
Chandler v. Cooke
137 So. 496 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1931)
Mortgage Security Corp. of America v. Hartman
130 So. 739 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1930)
Wilczinski v. Smith
70 So. 347 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1915)
Snyder v. Middle States Loan, Building & Construction Co.
44 S.E. 250 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1902)
Purvis v. Woodward
78 Miss. 922 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1901)
Shannon v. Georgia State Building & Loan Ass'n
78 Miss. 955 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1901)
Kendrick v. Kyle
78 Miss. 278 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1900)
Edwards v. Rumph
48 Ark. 479 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1886)
Lee v. Feamster
21 W. Va. 108 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1882)
Chaffe v. Wilson
59 Miss. 42 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1881)
Nance v. Gregory
74 Tenn. 343 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1880)
Munter & Faber v. Linn
61 Ala. 492 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1878)
Duncan v. Helm
22 La. Ann. 418 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1870)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 Miss. 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/malister-v-jerman-miss-1856.