Boyd v. Warmack

Mississippi Supreme Court

Boyd v. Warmack

62 Miss. 536

Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided April 15, 1885·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Campbell, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

We regard the question presented by this case as settled adversely to the appellant by former adjudications of this court. McAlister v. Jerman, 32 Miss. 142; Chaffe v. Wilson, 59 Miss. 42.

’There is no just distinction between a purchaser of the equity of redemption by an absolute conveyance and one who has a mortgage or deed of trust on it.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Campbell, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

We regard the question presented by this case as settled adversely to the appellant by former adjudications of this court. McAlister v. Jerman, 32 Miss. 142; Chaffe v. Wilson, 59 Miss. 42.

’There is no just distinction between a purchaser of the equity of redemption by an absolute conveyance and one who has a mortgage or deed of trust on it.

Decree affirmed.

Boyd v. Warmack, 62 Miss. 536 (Mich. 1885).

Pincite

62 Miss. 536 (Boyd v. Warmack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related