Wilcox v. State
This text of 18 S.W.3d 636 (Wilcox v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
delivered a concurring opinion,
I write separately to emphasize my displeasure with the actions taken by the trial court here. I cannot condone its act of [637]*637dismissing the jury and sitting as fact-finder for the punishment evidence. When a defendant pleads guilty in front of a jury, the trial is not bifurcated, but rather is a unitary trial asking that the fact-finder determine punishment only — not guilt. See Carroll v. State, 975 S.W.2d 630, 631-32 (Tex.Crim.App.1998). Trial courts should not attempt to circumvent the State’s statutory right to refuse consent to a defendant’s jury waiver by dismissing the jury before it has performed its only objective in a guilty plea case: determining punishment.
With these thoughts, I concur in the improvident grant of the State’s petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 S.W.3d 636, 2000 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 47, 2000 WL 526100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilcox-v-state-texcrimapp-2000.