Wilcox v. Eastern Oregon Land Co.

176 U.S. 51, 20 S. Ct. 269, 44 L. Ed. 368, 1900 U.S. LEXIS 1717
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 8, 1900
Docket23
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 176 U.S. 51 (Wilcox v. Eastern Oregon Land Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilcox v. Eastern Oregon Land Co., 176 U.S. 51, 20 S. Ct. 269, 44 L. Ed. 368, 1900 U.S. LEXIS 1717 (1900).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Harlan

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case depends in part upon the construction of the act of Congress of July 2, 1864, 13 Stat. 365, c. 217, in aid of the *52 construction of the Northern Pacific Railroad. The provisions of that act, so far as they are material to the present controversy, are fully set forth in the opinion in United States v. Oregon & California Railroad Company, just decided.

By an act of February 25, 1867, Congress, in aid of thb construction of a military wagon road in Oregon from Dalles City on the Columbia River, by way of Camp Watson, Canyon City and Mormon or Humboldt Basin, to a point on Snake River opposite Fort Boise in Idaho Territory, granted to the State of Oregon “alternate sections of public lands designated by odd numbers to the extent of three sections in width on each side of said road: Provided, That . . . any and all lands heretofore reserved to the United States or otherwise appropriated by act oí Congress or other competent authority, be and the same are hereby reserved from the operation of this act, except so far as it may be necessary to locate the route of said.road through the same, in which case the right of way to the width of one hundred feet is granted: And provided further, That the grant hereby made shall not embrace any mineral lands of the United States.” 14 Stat. 409, c. 77.

Other sections of that act are as follows: “ § 2. That the lands hereby granted to said State shall be disposed of by the legislature thereof for the purpose aforesaid, and for.no other; and the said road shall be and remain a public highway for the use of the Government of the United States, free from tolls or other charges upon transportation of any property, troops or mails of the United States.” “ § 4. That the State of Oregon is authorized to locate and use in- the construction of said road an additional amount of public lands, not previously reserved to the United States nor otherwise disposed of, and not exceeding ten miles in distance from it, equal to the amount reserved from the operation of this act in the first section of the same, to be selected in alternate odd sections as provided in section first of this act. § 5. - That, lands hereby granted tó Said State shall be disposed o.f only in the following manner, that is- to say, when the governor of said State shall certify to the Secretary of the Interior that ten continuous miles of said road are completed, then a' quantity of the *53 land hereby granted, not to exceed thirty sections, may be sold, and so on from time to time until said road shall be completed ; and if said road is not completed within five years, no further sales shall be made, and the lands remaining' unsold shall revert to the United States. § 6. That the United States surveyor general for the district of Oregon shall cause said lands so granted to be surveyed at the earliest practicable period after said State shalL have enacted the necessary legislation to carry this act into effect.”

Subsequently, by an act approved October 20, 1868, the State of Oregon granted to the Dalles Military Eoad Company all the lands, right' of way, rights, privileges and immunities granted or pledged by the above act of February 25,1867, “ for the purpose of aiding said company in constructing the road mentioned and described in said act of Congress upon the conditions and limitations therein prescribed.” The State also, by the same act, granted and pledged to that company “.all moneys, lands, rights, privileges and immunities which may be hereafter granted to this State to aid in the construction of such road for the purposes and upon the conditions mentioned in said act of Congress, or which may be mentioned in any further grants of money or lands to aid in constructing -said road,” and authorized it to locate the lands mentioned in the fourth section of the act of Congress, subject to the approval of the Governor. Sess. Laws 1868, p. 3.

The .material facts out of which the.present suit arises are alleged in the bill, and are substantially admitted in the answer. They are as follows:

Prior to June 23, 1869, the Dalles.Military Eoad Company had duly surveyed and definitely located its line of road between the points designated by Congress and the State; had fully constructed and completed its road, and had filed in the office of the governor a plat or map upon which was traced and shown the definite location of the road from Dallas City to its terminus on Snake Eiver, as well as the limits of the place and indemnity lands embraced by the act of Congress.

On the 23d day of June, 1869, the Governor certified that *54 such plat or. map had been duly filed in his office, and that it showed the route upon-which the road was constructed in accordance with the above acts of Congress and of the legislature of Oregon; also, that he had made- a. careful examination of the road since its completion,- and that the same had •been built in all respects as required:by those acts and had been accepted.

The above map and the certificate of the Governor were filed by the company in the office of the Secretary of the Interior, and on December 18, 1869, the Commissioner of the General Land Office, by order of the Secretary, withdrew from sale in favor of the company the odd-numbered sections within three miles from each side of the wagon road as delineated and' shown on the maps so filed. •

By an act of Congress approved June 18, 1874, it was provided that “ in all cases when the roads in aid of the construction of which said lands were granted are shown by the certificate of the Governor of the State of Orgeon, as in said-acts provided, to have been constructed and completed,' patehts for said lands shall issue in due form' to the State of Oregon as fast as the same shall, 'under said grants,- be' selected and. certified, unless the State of Oregbn shall' by public act have, transferred its interests in said lands to any corporation or corporations, in which case the patents shall issue from the General Land Office to such- corporation or corporations upon their payment of the necessary expenses thereof: Provided, That this shall not be construed to revive any. land grant already expired nor to create any new rights of any kind except to provide for issuing patents for lands to which the State is already entitled.” 18 Stat. 80, c. 805.

On the 31st day of May, 1876, Edward Martin, in good faith and for a valuable consideration, $125,000, purchased from the. Military Road Company all the lands embraced in the grant to it, except such as it'had previously sold, and received a conveyance thereof. Bad faith is not imputed to Martin, and it is only claimed that when he purchased those lands he was chargeable with constructive notice of the acts of Congress, and that no title could pass to the Militar}' Road Company *55 consistently with the above act of July 2, 1864, granting lands to the Northern Pacific Railroad Company.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Quong Ham Wah Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission
192 P. 1021 (California Supreme Court, 1920)
Herrick v. Barzee
190 P. 141 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1920)
Brandon v. Ard
211 U.S. 11 (Supreme Court, 1908)
Andrews v. Eastern Oregon Land Co.
203 U.S. 127 (Supreme Court, 1906)
Sjoli v. Dreschel
199 U.S. 564 (Supreme Court, 1905)
Eastern Oregon Land Co. v. Andrews
77 P. 117 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1904)
Nelson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
188 U.S. 108 (Supreme Court, 1903)
Messinger v. Union Warehouse Co.
65 P. 808 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 U.S. 51, 20 S. Ct. 269, 44 L. Ed. 368, 1900 U.S. LEXIS 1717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilcox-v-eastern-oregon-land-co-scotus-1900.