Wiggins v. Stapleton Baptist Church

223 So. 2d 519, 284 Ala. 174, 1969 Ala. LEXIS 1050
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedMay 8, 1969
Docket1 Div. 570
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 223 So. 2d 519 (Wiggins v. Stapleton Baptist Church) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wiggins v. Stapleton Baptist Church, 223 So. 2d 519, 284 Ala. 174, 1969 Ala. LEXIS 1050 (Ala. 1969).

Opinion

LAWSON, Justice.

This is an appeal from a final decree of the Circuit Court of Baldwin County, in Equity, rendered on August 28, 1968.

There are thirteen assignments of error, none of which complies with Supreme Court Rule 1, as revised on March 21, 1966, so as to require that “each assignment shall list the page or pages of the transcript of the record on which the ruling is recorded.”

While it is true that the revised Rule, -supra, does not appear in the Appendix, 'Title 7, Code 1940, or in the Cumulative Pocket Part to the Recompiled Code of 1958, it does appear in 279 Alabama at page XXIII. Reference to that revision was made by this court in the case of State v. Barnhill, 280 Ala. 574, 196 So.2d 691, and the revised rule was applied in National Finance Company, Inc. v. Rowe, 281 Ala. 658, 659, 207 So.2d 133, 134.

In the case last cited we said:

“We hold that the revision, supra, mandates that each assignment of error shall list the page or pages of the transcript on which the ruling is recorded, and that it has application to all appeals submitted after March 21, 1966.”

See Edmondson v. Edmondson, 281 Ala. 191, 200 So.2d 652; Jones v. Miller et al., 282 Ala. 231, 210 So.2d 793.

Appellant having failed to comply with Supreme Court Rule 1, as revised on March 21, 1966, the decree of the trial court is •affirmed.

Affirmed.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and MERRILL and ITARWOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

May v. May
267 So. 2d 174 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1972)
Kyzer v. Kyzer
269 So. 2d 126 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1972)
Crowe v. Crowe
266 So. 2d 153 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1972)
Kyle v. Kyle
263 So. 2d 142 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1972)
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Hammac
261 So. 2d 893 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1972)
Atlantic American Life Insurance Co. v. Hamilton
263 So. 2d 146 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1972)
Johnston v. Johnston
252 So. 2d 330 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
223 So. 2d 519, 284 Ala. 174, 1969 Ala. LEXIS 1050, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wiggins-v-stapleton-baptist-church-ala-1969.