Jones v. Miller

210 So. 2d 793, 282 Ala. 231, 1968 Ala. LEXIS 1115
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided May 23, 1968·No. 5 Div. 854·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

LIVINGSTON, Chief Justice.

This appeal is from a judgment for the defendant in an action for malicious prosecution.

After all the evidence had been preT sented, both for the plaintiff and defendant, the judge gave the written affirmative charge at the request of defendant.

Appellee has filed a motion to affirm the judgment of the trial court, assigning as a ground that appellant’s assignments of error in this case do not reflect the page or pages of the transcript of the record on which the ruling of the trial court made the basis of the assignment of error is recorded.

Appellant makes two assignments of error, neither of which complies with Supreme Court Rule 1, revised on March 21, 1966, and found in 279 Ala. XXIII. Rule 1 provides that “each assignment shall list the page or pages of the transcript of the record on which the ruling is recorded.”

This Court has held that the above-noted provision of Revised Rule 1 is mandatory. National Finance Co. v. Rowe, 281 Ala. 658, 207 So.2d 133. Therefore, we have no alternative but to affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Affirmed.

LAWSON, COLEMAN and KOHN. JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones v. Miller, 210 So. 2d 793, 282 Ala. 231, 1968 Ala. LEXIS 1115 (Ala. 1968).

210 So. 2d 793 (Jones v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hertz Corp. v. Patriot General Insurance, No. Cv 960559870 (Jan. 28, 1998)
1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 685 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1998)
Agency Rent-A-Car v. Itt Hartford Acc., No. Cv-93-0530573-S (Oct. 23, 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 11171 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)
May v. May
267 So. 2d 174 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1972)
Kyzer v. Kyzer
269 So. 2d 126 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1972)
Crowe v. Crowe
266 So. 2d 153 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1972)
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Hammac
261 So. 2d 893 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1972)
Atlantic American Life Insurance Co. v. Hamilton
263 So. 2d 146 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1972)
Wiggins v. Stapleton Baptist Church
223 So. 2d 519 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1969)
State v. Smith
218 So. 2d 266 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1969)