Whitehead v. Warden
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BISHOPLAMOR WHITEHEAD, Petitioner, 25 CIVIL 0594 (LTS) -against- JUDGMENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al, Respondents. wen eK It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated May 27, 2025, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, construed as brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, is denied without prejudice as prematurely filed. Because the petition makes no substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253. The Court certifies, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). DATED: New York, New York May 28, 2025
TAMMI M. HELLWIG Clerkof Court BY: pon Dll
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Whitehead v. Warden (Whitehead v. Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.