White v. State
728 So. 2d 322, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2152, 1999 WL 95055
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 26, 1999·No. No. 97-04780·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
David White challenges his sentence imposed for grand theft of a firearm. He correctly contends that it was error for the trial court to assess eighteen additional sentencing points for possessing a firearm where possession of a firearm is a necessary element of the offense. See Scott v. State, 718 [323]*323So.2d 751 (Fla.1998); White v. State, 714 So.2d 440 (Fla.1998). The State concedes error. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for resentencing with a corrected scoresheet.
Reversed and remanded for resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
White v. State, 728 So. 2d 322, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2152, 1999 WL 95055 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
728 So. 2d 322 (White v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gonzales v. State
779 So. 2d 520 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)